ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2026
A cross-sectional survey of Australian women's perspectives and experiences of exercise during pregnancy, including women that experience mental illness.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe study aimed to understand women’s perspectives and experiences around exercise during pregnancy, including women that experience mental illnesses.
methodsThe study utilised a cross-sectional online survey of women living in Australia who have experienced a pregnancy, recruited via social medial platforms and general practice clinics. The 45-item questionnaire collected data on demographics, exercise during pregnancy, mental illness diagnoses, attitudes regarding exercise during pregnancy and knowledge of exercise in pregnancy guidelines. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and chi-square analyses, with pairwise comparison adjustments using Bonferroni correction.
resultsThere were 695 responses. Respondents believe that regular exercise during pregnancy is safe (n = 593, 94%), and could prevent a decline in (n = 544, 88%), and improve (n = 570, 92%) a pregnant person’s mood. Most respondents (n = 425, 71%) were unaware of the World Health Organization (WHO)/Australian National guidelines regarding exercise during pregnancy. Despite most respondents (n = 412, 68%) participating in exercise during pregnancy, the majority did not meet the Australian recommended guidelines for total weekly moderate-intensity (n = 315, 79%) or vigorous physical activity (n = 301, 75%). Fewer respondents with a mental illness exercised during pregnancy compared to those without (n = 140, 61% vs. n = 272, 71%, p = 0.009). Most respondents (n = 458, 69%) received no or little advice from their healthcare provider about the safety and benefits of exercise during pregnancy, but 45% (n = 299) of respondents felt satisfied about the advice they did receive.
conclusionWomen living in Australia believe that exercise during pregnancy is safe and has benefits for mental health but receive little advice about this from their healthcare provider. Women were not aware of or meeting the WHO/National guidelines regarding exercise in pregnancy. Importantly, fewer respondents with a reported mental illness exercised during pregnancy than those without a reported mental illness. Considering the potential benefits of exercise in pregnancy including for mental illness, strategies are needed to increase engagement with exercise during pregnancy, particularly those with a mental illness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.