ArticleCardiovascular diabetology2026
Clinical subgroup-stratified plasma proteomic signatures improve risk prediction for myocardial infarction: SCORE2-Pro.
Article in Cardiovascular diabetology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Machine learning and multi-omics technologies for precision cardiovascular medicine: advancing diagnosis, risk prediction, and therapeutic guidance.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMyocardial infarction (MI) remains a leading cause of global mortality, with risk varying substantially across demographic and clinical subgroups. Although SCORE2 is widely implemented for cardiovascular risk stratification, the extent to which clinical subgroup specific plasma proteomics can further refine personalized MI risk prediction remains uncertain.
methodsSCORE2-Pro, a clinical subgroup-stratified plasma proteome prediction model was built stratified by sex, age, smoking status, non-high-density lipoprotein (non-HDL) cholesterol, and systolic blood pressure. In 51,010 UK Biobank participants (aged 40-69 years; 54.9% female) without MI at baseline, 70% were used for model development, and the remaining 30% for an internal hold-out validation. We used light gradient boosting machine classifiers and Cox proportional hazards models to identify top-predictive protein combinations and stratification strategies for MI.
resultsThe SCORE2-Pro model revealed distinct and highly effective protein panels for each subgroup. Compared with the clinical model, SCORE2-Pro remarkably enhanced predictive performance across demographic and clinical subgroups. A 9-protein model in females improved AUC by + 0.061 (P = 1.51 × 10
conclusionsBy adopting a clinical subgroup stratification approach using factors derived from SCORE2, we identified subgroup-specific proteomic signatures for MI that considerably improve predictive accuracy and reclassification beyond traditional clinical models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.