ReviewAfrican journal of primary health care & family medicine2026
Acceptability, feasibility and equity implications of nutritional supplementation interventions for the prevention of wasting in infants and young children: A rapid qualitative evidence synthesis.
Review in African journal of primary health care & family medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChild wasting remains a challenge despite global targets to eliminate malnutrition by 2030. While the global nutrition community has traditionally focused on treatment, a range of nutrition-specific interventions to prevent child wasting are available.
aimTo conduct a rapid qualitative evidence synthesis exploring factors influencing the acceptability, feasibility and equity of preventative interventions to inform a World Health Organization (WHO) guideline on child wasting. This manuscript reports on nutritional supplementation interventions, a subsection of the broader scope of the guideline.
methodWe searched MEDLINE (PubMed) (database inception to 13 June 2022) for eligible studies. We coded and synthesised findings using a 'best fit' framework synthesis approach and assessed methodological quality of included studies. We presented fit-for-purpose evidence to complete qualitative evidence-to-decision criteria for the WHO recommendation.
resultsWe included 25 articles and identified 27 themes relating to acceptability, feasibility and equity for nutritional supplementation interventions. Nutritional supplementation in children was mostly acceptable, but acceptability was mixed for other recipients. Several barriers to and facilitators of nutritional supplementation across intended recipient groups were identified, with education or information frequently emerging as facilitator. Health beliefs, as well as practical challenges, are notable barriers. Evidence on equity is sparse, but sharing practices and gender roles emerged as exacerbating factors.
conclusionNutritional supplementation interventions are probably acceptable, and there are facilitators of implementation; however, some barriers would also need to be considered. Information regarding equity was relatively sparse.Contribution: Our findings were used in drafting the WHO guideline recommendations on child wasting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.