ReviewJVS-vascular science2026
A narrative review of recent literature of circulating biomarkers of abdominal aortic aneurysm.
Review in JVS-vascular science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cytokine-Family Biomarker Candidates for Small Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Identified via Integrated mRNA and Protein Expression Profiling.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Total Thrombus-Formation Analysis System (T-TAS) in Aortopathies: A Conceptual and Potential Framework to Spatial Heterogeneity and Regional Context.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Extracellular vesicles for abdominal aortic aneurysm: mechanisms, therapeutic potential, and translational challenges.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) arise through complex pathogenesis, and good methods of risk stratification have proved elusive. Further, the lack of medical options short of surgery for treatment, and the requirement for dedicated imaging for identification, result in delayed diagnosis and hamper patient outcomes. Application of circulating biomarkers to effectively assess disease presence and predict progression would improve clinical management and support patient well-being. Exploration for suitable circulating biomarkers of AAAs is still very much in process; however, no disease-specific biomarker has yet been established for effective diagnosis and prognosis. This review aims to contribute enhanced tools for utilizing biomarkers for risk stratification and management of AAA disease. Methods: Utilizing MEDLINE/PubMed, we summarize 44 recent publications covering circulating AAA biomarkers. The biomarkers were categorized and tiered into six subgroups by study design, with prospective studies tiered higher than retrospective observational studies. The classification system separately describes a list of post-interventional monitoring biomarkers. Part of the review also deals with recent approaches to identifying potential AAA biomarkers by genetic inference. Results: Forty individual circulating biomarkers, two plasma protein panels (consisting of 9 or 7 proteins), one plasma-multiomic study, and two micro-RNA (miR) panels revealed correlations to AAA disease risk. Among those, many have already been established as biomarkers for other cardiovascular diseases, meaning feasibility has been proven but disease specificity is lacking. Conclusions: Multiple circulating proteins and miRs have been investigated for their utility as AAA-specific diagnostic or prognostic biomarkers. This work may ultimately identify not only novel AAA biomarkers that are specific for cell type, proteins, metabolites, genetic polymorphisms, and miRNA, but permit framing of comprehensive networks of disease-participating molecules. More robust data with higher disease sensitivity and specificity are needed, along with more multi-centered longitudinal clinical studies with large sample sizes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.