ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2026
Urine-based point-of-care detection of direct oral anticoagulant activity in acute stroke-accuracy at anti-Xa thresholds relevant for intravenous thrombolysis.
Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Rapid assessment of direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) activity is essential in acute ischemic stroke (AIS), particularly because intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) may be considered at anti-Xa levels ≤ 100 ng/mL. Laboratory drug-specific assays; however, are often limited by availability and turnaround time. A urine-based point-of-care (POC) test may provide a rapid alternative. Objectives: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of a urine-based POC dipstick for detecting clinically relevant DOAC activity at (1) the established screening threshold (≥30 ng/mL) and (2) the IVT-relevant threshold (≥100 ng/mL), using calibrated plasma DOAC levels as a reference standard. Methods: In this prospective diagnostic accuracy study (UPTURN trial), consecutive AIS patients underwent urine-based POC testing. Dipstick results, recorded as visual and automatic readouts, were analyzed against plasma DOAC activity. Relevant anticoagulant activity was defined as anti-Xa ≥30 ng/mL; the IVT eligibility threshold was defined as anti-Xa <100 ng/mL. Factor Xa inhibitors were quantified using drug-specific chromogenic anti-Xa assays; dabigatran activity was measured using Biophen DTI. Diagnostic accuracy metrics were calculated with exact 95% CIs. Time-to-result was compared between POC testing and plasma assays. Results: Among 101 AIS patients (55 with DOAC intake), the urine-based dipstick test reliably identified relevant anticoagulatory activity (anti-Xa ≥30 ng/mL) with a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 96.3% (automated readout). Visual interpretation yielded similar accuracy. For higher anti-Xa levels (≥100 ng/mL), sensitivity remained 100%, though specificity decreased (74.4%). A double-positive visual result increased specificity to 92.8% at 84.4% sensitivity. Median time to result was 19 minutes for urine testing versus 144 minutes for blood-based assays. Test performance was consistent across DOAC agents, dosages, and intake timing. Visual grading enabled semiquantitative discrimination of DOAC levels. Conclusion: Urine-based DOAC dipstick testing is a rapid, accurate, and reliable method for detecting anticoagulatory activity in AIS patients, providing a valuable tool to guide acute therapeutic decisions. Future studies are warranted to validate its clinical impact and broader applicability, especially in the emergency setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.