ReviewPalliative care and social practice2026
Unraveling the complexities: A scoping review of the collateral effects on informal caregivers during and beyond the COVID-19 pandemic.
Review in Palliative care and social practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, various infection control measures were introduced that had a profound effect on caregiving dynamics and created burdens in the daily lives of informal caregivers (ICs). A scoping review was conducted to identify burden and support factors for ICs during and beyond the pandemic. Studies were included when they examined ICs' care work during the official time period of the COVID-19 pandemic (March 2020-May 2023) and care hours worked per day or week were specified. Only studies with adult participants and studies in German or English language were incorporated. The scoping review considered quantitative cross-sectional and longitudinal studies involving randomized/quasi-randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, case studies, mixed-methods, and qualitative studies as well as reviews and meta-analyses. The electronic databases PubMed, the Cochrane COVID-19 Study Register, and EBSCO Host were systematically searched. The search was limited to articles published between 2020 and 2024. The scoping review was conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews. Overall, 42 studies with 51,183individuals met the inclusion criteria and were included in the scoping review. Main findings suggested that the pandemic-related measures caused additional care burden for ICs and worsened the already poor situation of informal care. In particular, the lack of support from health services and the increase in care hours were described as burdensome. Additionally, studies indicated an increase in rates of depression and overall poor mental health, particularly affecting female ICs. Social and formal care support were mentioned as main support factors. Consequently, preparation of future crises should focus on formal health services and structures to promote social support and mental health of ICs during pandemics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.