Evidence mapPaperPMID 41630899Full record

ReviewPalliative care and social practice2026

Unraveling the complexities: A scoping review of the collateral effects on informal caregivers during and beyond the COVID-19 pandemic.

Miriam Nicolai, Anneke Ullrich, Jessica Ruck, Birgit Jaspers, Arndt Bialobrzeski, Rebecca Degutsch, Karin Oechsle, Lukas Radbruch, Ildiko Gágyor, Nora Hettich-Damm

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Palliative care and social practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Miriam NicolaiDepartment for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-4885-1603
Anneke UllrichPalliative Care Unit, Department of Oncology, Hematology and BMT, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
Jessica RuckDepartment of General Practice, University Hospital Würzburg, Germany.
Birgit JaspersDepartment of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Germany.
Arndt BialobrzeskiDepartment of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7145-1330
Rebecca DegutschDepartment of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-3310-8518
Karin OechslePalliative Care Unit, Department of Oncology, Hematology and BMT, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
Lukas RadbruchDepartment of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Germany.
Ildiko GágyorDepartment of General Practice, University Hospital Würzburg, Germany.
Nora Hettich-DammDepartment for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, various infection control measures were introduced that had a profound effect on caregiving dynamics and created burdens in the daily lives of informal caregivers (ICs). A scoping review was conducted to identify burden and support factors for ICs during and beyond the pandemic. Studies were included when they examined ICs' care work during the official time period of the COVID-19 pandemic (March 2020-May 2023) and care hours worked per day or week were specified. Only studies with adult participants and studies in German or English language were incorporated. The scoping review considered quantitative cross-sectional and longitudinal studies involving randomized/quasi-randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, case studies, mixed-methods, and qualitative studies as well as reviews and meta-analyses. The electronic databases PubMed, the Cochrane COVID-19 Study Register, and EBSCO Host were systematically searched. The search was limited to articles published between 2020 and 2024. The scoping review was conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews. Overall, 42 studies with 51,183individuals met the inclusion criteria and were included in the scoping review. Main findings suggested that the pandemic-related measures caused additional care burden for ICs and worsened the already poor situation of informal care. In particular, the lack of support from health services and the increase in care hours were described as burdensome. Additionally, studies indicated an increase in rates of depression and overall poor mental health, particularly affecting female ICs. Social and formal care support were mentioned as main support factors. Consequently, preparation of future crises should focus on formal health services and structures to promote social support and mental health of ICs during pandemics.

Indexed as

COVID-19informal caregiverspandemicscoping review

Identifiers

PMID41630899
PMCPMC12861382

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.