ArticleKidney medicine2026
Real-World Effectiveness of Ravulizumab Among C5 Inhibitor-Naive Patients With Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome: A Physician Panel-Based Chart Review (aHUS IMPACT Study).
Article in Kidney medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Complement Dysregulation in Kidney Diseases: Mechanisms, Biomarkers, and Emerging Targeted Therapies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rationale & Objective: Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) is a rare form of thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) caused by complement dysregulation. Ravulizumab, a complement C5 inhibitor (C5i), is approved for aHUS; however, published evidence in a real-world setting is limited. Study Design: Retrospective, longitudinal, physician panel-based chart review. Setting & Population: C5i-naive adults with aHUS in the United States treated with ravulizumab. Physicians randomly selected 1-5 patients who had ≥6 months of follow-up after ravulizumab initiation; patients who died within 6 months of initiation were eligible. Exposures or Predictors: Ravulizumab. Outcomes: The clinical outcomes evaluated included hematologic and renal outcomes, complete TMA response (a composite hematolgic/renal endpoint), and dialysis use. Analytical Approach: Descriptive statistics, Kaplan-Meier estimators, and generalized linear models. Results: Overall, 79 C5i-naive adults with aHUS (enrolled by 31 physicians) initiated ravulizumab and were included in the study. Statistically significant improvements from baseline occurred as early as day 4 (lactate dehydrogenase and percent change in serum creatinine; both Limitations: The study design relies on available medical record data and has potential responder bias. Conclusions: This study supports the immediate and sustained benefits of initiating ravulizumab in patients with aHUS as seen by the early response and continued improvement in clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.