ReviewEndocrine reviews2026
Vitamin D and Uterine Fibroids: Insights into Pathophysiology and Therapeutic Potential.
Review in Endocrine reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Uterine fibroids (UFs) are highly prevalent benign tumors, primarily affecting women of reproductive age. The prevalence of UFs is estimated at 25% to 70% to 80%, with significantly higher rates among African women. Recent investigations have unveiled a link between vitamin D (VD) levels and the presence of UFs. Current data show that individuals with sufficient VD levels are at a reduced risk of developing UFs. This review aims to synthesize the latest discoveries on the involvement of VD in the pathophysiology of UFs, as well as to explore its feasible therapeutic applications. The mechanisms underlying the potential of VD to diminish the risk of UF development and to inhibit their growth are multifaceted and include its antiproliferative effects, the induction of apoptosis, suppression of angiogenesis, or the modulation of enzyme activity. The potential of VD and its analogues as promising agents for managing and preventing UFs was demonstrated. However, further research is needed to clarify the biological mechanisms behind the role of VD in UF pathophysiology, and its definitive efficacy has to be confirmed through randomized clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.