SynthesisSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2026
Effect of patient education in improving quality of life, fatigue and anxiety in people diagnosed with lung cancer: systematic review.
Synthesis in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Health-Related Quality of Life in Lung Cancer Survivors: Sociodemographic, Clinical, and Psychosocial Modulators.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo assess the effect of patient education on quality of life, fatigue, and anxiety in patients diagnosed with lung cancer.
methodsAn electronic search was conducted across four databases (PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Scopus) using a combination of terms including lung neoplasms, health education, educat (truncated), quality of life, fatigue, and anxiety. The Cochrane RoB 2 tool and the TIDieR checklist were used to assess risk of bias and intervention replicability, respectively. The GRADE approach was applied to evaluate the certainty of the evidence. Study selection, data extraction, and all assessments were carried out independently by two reviewers. Where appropriate, data were pooled using meta-analysis (95% confidence interval [CI]).
resultsSeventeen studies were included in the qualitative synthesis, and thirteen in the quantitative analysis, comprising a total sample of 1799 participants. The meta-analysis demonstrated that, compared with controls, patient education interventions had a statistically significant and large effect on improving quality of life (SMD = 0.98; 95% CI [0.26, 1.69], p = 0.007, I
conclusionsPatient education appears to be an effective approach for improving quality of life, fatigue, and anxiety in individuals with lung cancer. Nevertheless, these findings should be interpreted with caution, as the certainty of the evidence was rated as very low.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.