ArticleScientific reports2026
Safety and exploratory functional effects of topical cord blood serum in glaucoma patients.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To evaluate the safety, tolerability, and potential functional signals associated with cord blood serum (CBS) eye drops as adjunctive treatment in patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) already under intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering therapy. In this monocentric prospective pilot study, 20 OAG patients (37 eyes) received topical CBS eye drops 8 times daily for 60 days, in addition to their standard hypotensive therapy. Ophthalmic evaluations were performed at baseline (V1), end of treatment (V4), and 60 days after discontinuation (V5), and included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), IOP, visual field (VF), pattern electroretinography (PERG), and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness. Statistical analyses assessed changes in functional and structural parameters. The treatment was well tolerated, with no adverse events and no significant changes in IOP or BCVA. Visual field mean deviation (MD), PERG parameters, and RNFL thickness showed non-significant variations across visits. A statistically significant RNFL thinning was observed in the infero-temporal sector between V1 and V4, although likely due to outlier effects. Linear mixed model analysis showed a significant increase in N95 amplitude at V5 compared to V4 when baseline MD was considered as a covariate. CBS eye drops were safe and well tolerated in this glaucoma population. Although no statistically significant functional or structural improvement was observed, some exploratory signals suggest potential neuroretinal involvement that warrants further investigation in larger, controlled studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.