ArticleScientific reports2026
Smart CaCO
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Constipation is a prevalent gastrointestinal disorder often associated with impaired intestinal motility and unbalanced gut microbiota. Although probiotics offer therapeutic potential, their clinical efficacy is often limited by low gastric survival and inefficient intestinal release. Herein, we developed a novel smart delivery platform by encapsulating five probiotic strains within a single-layer calcium carbonate coating, designated as Probiotics Encapsulated with Calcium carbonate (PEC). This system is designed to respond to both pH and phosphate levels, enabling targeted intestinal probiotic delivery. Using a loperamide-induced constipation rat model, we evaluated the PEC therapeutic efficacy at three doses (15, 50, and 150 mg/kg). PEC administration significantly improved key constipation indicators, including defecation frequency, fecal moisture content, and intestinal transit rate in a dose-dependent manner. Furthermore, PEC selectively modulated harmful microbial enzymes such as β-glucuronidase and nitroreductase without adversely impacting the beneficial β-glucosidase enzyme. It also showed a trend to reduce systemic inflammatory markers, such as TNF-α and IL-1β. Notably, the high-dose PEC group restored most parameters to levels comparable to those of the normal group. These findings suggest that the PEC platform is a promising next-generation probiotic delivery system with potential to address some limitations of conventional probiotic therapy, such as low gastric survival and inefficient intestinal release. However, without dedicated control groups for calcium carbonate alone or uncoated probiotics, the specific contributions of the encapsulation cannot be fully isolated. PEC shows strong potential for development into functional foods and therapeutic agents targeting constipation and related gastrointestinal disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.