Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41634404›Full record

ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2026

Targeted panel sequencing for refining B-cell lymphoma diagnosis: a real-life, reference center experience.

Julia Böck, Katja Maurus, Julia Doll, Stephanie Brändlein, Qunpei Yang, Katrin S Kurz, German Ott, Ioannis Anagnostopoulos, Andreas Rosenwald, Alberto Zamò and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Julia BöckInstitute of Pathology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Katja MaurusInstitute of Pathology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Julia DollInstitute of Pathology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Stephanie BrändleinInstitute of Pathology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Qunpei YangInstitute of Pathology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Katrin S KurzRobert-Bosch-Hospital, Dr. Margarete Fischer-Bosch Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Stuttgart, Germany.
German OttRobert-Bosch-Hospital, Dr. Margarete Fischer-Bosch Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Stuttgart, Germany.
Ioannis AnagnostopoulosInstitute of Pathology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Andreas RosenwaldInstitute of Pathology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Alberto ZamòInstitute of Pathology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Elena Gerhard-HartmannInstitute of Pathology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany. elena.hartmann@uni-wuerzburg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2134-2774

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The reliable diagnosis of one of the many types of B-cell lymphoma (BCL) currently requires an integrated approach comprising morphological expertise, immunophenotyping, and inclusion of clinical data, but may also incorporate flow cytometry, cytogenetics, and clonality analysis. In recent years, several studies have elucidated the mutational landscape of BCL, which may also serve as a complementary diagnostic tool. We have developed a custom next-generation sequencing panel for application in the routine diagnosis of BCL based on available literature and our diagnostic questions. We applied this panel to 160 cases of BCL or with this differential diagnosis (DD) in our routine workflow to gain further diagnostic support or on clinical request. Evaluable results were obtained in all but two cases of the entire cohort. Diagnostically informative molecular genetic profiles were identified in 72% of the evaluable cases. Focusing on 21 challenging cases with the DD of Burkitt lymphoma (BL) and the germinal center B-cell-like subtype of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), we detected at least one mutation in all cases, and in 18/21 (86%) cases, panel sequencing provided significant decision guidance. In conclusion, although morphology and immunohistochemistry remain the backbone of diagnosis, panel sequencing provided substantial diagnostic assistance in many cases. It has been particularly useful in providing additional arguments to clarify the clinically important DD between BL and DLBCL in challenging cases.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBurkitt LymphomaHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingLymphoma, B-CellLymphoma, Large B-Cell, DiffuseAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDiagnosis, DifferentialDNA Mutational AnalysisFemaleHumansImmunophenotypingMaleMiddle AgedMutationBiomarkers, TumorB-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomaMutationNGSRoutine diagnostics

Identifiers

PMID41634404
PMCPMC13053561

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.