Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41634798›Full record

Trial reportNutrition journal2026

Comparative effects of conventional cow's milk versus milk free of A1-type beta-casein on gastrointestinal physiology and symptoms of digestive discomfort in participants intolerant to conventional cow's milk: a pilot randomised controlled trial.

Frank L Greenway, Daniel S Hsia, Candida J Rebello

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nutrition journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06763185 (Comparative Effects of Conventional Cow's Milk Versus Milk Free of A1-type Beta-casein on Gastrointestinal Physiology and Symptoms of Digestive Discomfort in Participants Intolerant to Conventional Cow's Milk), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06763185 nacompletednot on this map

Comparative Effects of Conventional Cow's Milk Versus Milk Free of A1-type Beta-casein on Gastrointestinal Physiology and Symptoms of Digestive Discomfort in Participants Intolerant to Conventional Cow's Milk: a Randomised Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsora2 Milk Company Ltd.Ran2017 to 2019Enrolled54ConditionsDigestive DiscomfortArmsDietary Supplement: conventional cow's milk consumption, and then A1PF milk consumption, Dietary Supplement: A1PF milk consumption, and then conventional cow's milk consumption
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Frank L GreenwayPennington Biomedical Research Center, 6400 Perkins Road, Baton Rouge, LA, 70808, USA. frank.greenway@pbrc.edu.
Daniel S HsiaPennington Biomedical Research Center, 6400 Perkins Road, Baton Rouge, LA, 70808, USA.
Candida J RebelloPennington Biomedical Research Center, 6400 Perkins Road, Baton Rouge, LA, 70808, USA.

Funding

Lifestyle intervention to treat apathy in older adultsR00AG065419 · NIA · LSU PENNINGTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH CTR · PI REBELLO, CANDIDA JOAN · 2022 to 2024
$747k
NIA NIH HHS R00 AG065419
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCow’s milk is an important source of nutrients supporting human growth and development as well as adult health, but it can be associated with unwanted gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms. These symptoms are often attributed to lactose, but may instead be partly due to peptides released during digestion. This exploratory study aimed to compare the effects of consuming milk free of A1-type beta-casein (A1PF milk) with those of conventional cow’s milk (containing both A1- and A2-types of beta-casein) on GI symptoms in individuals who usually suffer from mild-to-moderate digestive discomfort after milk consumption.

methodsThis was a single-site, double-blind, randomised, controlled, crossover study in non-regular milk drinkers (aged 18–68 years) with self-reported intolerance to cow’s milk. Participants consumed either A1PF milk or conventional milk three times per day after meals. GI symptoms, GI parameters (assessed using a SmartPill™ ingestible sensor) and blood and faecal laboratory measurements were assessed.

resultsNo statistically significant between-group differences were seen in the frequency and consistency of stool; overall and individual GI symptoms; in GI parameters, including transit time; or in laboratory measurements including immunoglobulin (Ig)G, IgE, IgG1, interleukin-4, acetate, butyrate, propionate, short-chain fatty acid levels, or thiol levels. Among participants consuming A1PF milk, higher urinary galactose (U-gal) levels were correlated with smaller increases from baseline in patient-reported abdominal pain (r = − 0.296, p < 0.05); this correlation was not observed in participants consuming conventional milk. Additionally, higher U-gal levels were correlated with a greater increase in gastric transit time (r = 0.409, p < 0.05) and with a greater increase in glutathione level (r = 0.314, p < 0.05) only in participants consuming A1PF milk, but not in those consuming conventional milk.

conclusionSignificant correlations between higher U-gal values and changes in GI variables were seen in participants consuming A1PF milk, including increased glutathione, a smaller increase from baseline in abdominal pain, and a greater increase in gastric transit time. In terms of GI symptoms, individuals with higher baseline U-gal levels (indicating preserved lactase activity) may benefit from A1PF milk more than those with lower baseline U-gal levels.

trial registrationNCT06763185.

Indexed as

CaseinsGastrointestinal TractLactose IntoleranceMilkMilk HypersensitivityAdolescentAdultAnimalsCattleCross-Over StudiesDouble-Blind MethodFemaleGastrointestinal DiseasesHumansMaleMiddle AgedCaseinsA1 beta-caseinA2 beta-caseinDairy intoleranceGastrointestinal outcomesGlutathioneUrinary galactose

Identifiers

PMID41634798
PMCPMC12958625

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.