ReviewConflict and health2026
The overlapping effects of climate change and conflict on mental health of vulnerable populations: a scoping review.
Review in Conflict and health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe mental health impacts of climate change and armed conflict are well-documented separately, yet little is known about their intersection and the compounding effects on vulnerable populations exposed to both crises. AIMS/
objectiveThis scoping review aims to map the current evidence on the combined effects of climate change and conflict-related hazards on mental health outcomes. Specifically, we categorize the pathways through which climate change and conflict interact to influence psychological well-being.
methodsWe searched seven databases (PubMed, APA PsycINFO, CINAHL, Embase, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar) and conducted a comprehensive gray literature search. We included populations directly affected by armed conflict and climate hazards simultaneously. Eligible studies reported mental health outcomes, including but not limited to posttraumatic stress disorder, anxiety, depression, well-being, or resilience.
resultsThe initial search yielded 2,865 records, 27 of which met the inclusion criteria after deduplication and screening. Populations studied aligned with the Vulnerable Populations Conceptual Model, which includes women, children, the elderly, and other high-risk groups. Slow-onset climate hazards, particularly drought, were the most frequently examined. Geographically, research was focused primarily on sub-Saharan Africa and parts of Asia. The evidence included a nearly equal distribution of conceptual and empirical studies (13 and 14 respectively), with displacement and lack of resources being the dominant pathways mediating the interaction between climate and conflict on mental health.
conclusionDespite growing evidence, substantial gaps remain regarding the effects of climate change and conflict on mental health outside Africa and parts of Asia. Mental health initiatives should prioritize populations exposed to both climate and conflict hazards, addressing displacement, vulnerability, and resilience through integrated, context-sensitive interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.