ArticleJournal of fish biology2026
Effects of gill and muscle biopsies on the short-term behaviour, exercise performance and survival of juvenile lake trout (Salvelinus namaycush).
Article in Journal of fish biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Non-lethal biopsy is a valuable tool for gaining insight into the physiological status of fish in the wild and for predicting their subsequent behaviour and survival. However, linking the insights from biopsy to post-release behaviour relies on the assumption that the biopsy itself has no meaningful impact on post-release behaviour or survival (e.g. in animals tagged with electronic devices). This assumption is likely to be questioned by fishery managers, animal ethics committees, and other researchers. To date, there has been very little work to assess the sublethal (or lethal) effects of biopsies on fish, and no such studies have evaluated fine-scale behaviours. Here, muscle and gill tissue samples were taken (both individually and as a combined treatment) from hatchery-reared juvenile lake trout (Salvelinus namaycush) in captivity. Twenty-four hours after sampling, we used two behavioural assays (behaviour within a Z maze and flight initiation distance) and quantified exhaustive exercise performance to determine whether biopsies impacted behaviour or physiology when compared to non-sampled controls. We found no evidence that biopsies had any influence on exploratory and shelter-seeking behaviour in the maze, flight initiation distance, or time to exhaustion (as a proxy for swimming performance). Mortality during a 7-day monitoring period was very low (2% across treatments) and limited to fish that received either a gill biopsy or the combined biopsy treatment. This study provides empirical support for the use of non-lethal biopsy in juvenile salmonids as a means of collecting physiological data on individuals in behavioural studies and experiments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.