ReviewCureus2026
Microbiological Analyses of Subgingival Flora in Response to Probiotic Adjuncts to Non-surgical Periodontal Therapy: A Scoping Review.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This scoping review aimed to map the subgingival microbiological analysis methods used in randomized controlled trials evaluating probiotics as adjuncts to non-surgical periodontal therapy (NSPT) and to summarize the microbial and clinical outcomes reported. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science from January 2008 to October 2025 identified nine eligible studies that employed culture-based techniques, PCR/qPCR, DNA-DNA hybridization, and 16S rRNA sequencing of subgingival plaque samples. Evidence suggests that probiotics may provide short-term, strain-dependent modulation of the microbiota, characterized by transient reductions in key periodontal pathogens and early improvements in inflammatory parameters. However, substantial heterogeneity in microbiological methods limits direct comparison across studies and contributes to uncertainty regarding long-term ecological and clinical effects. While probiotics appear to offer supportive benefits during the early healing phase following NSPT, persistent microbial stability, durable colonization, and sustained clinical advantages have not been conclusively demonstrated. Given the limited use of high-resolution sequencing techniques and marked methodological variability, current evidence remains insufficient to support routine clinical application. Future studies incorporating standardized ecological endpoints, extended follow-up periods, and advanced molecular analyses are essential to clarify the true clinical relevance of probiotic adjuncts in periodontal therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.