Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41635346›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

A Comprehensive Review of Vaccine Development: From Traditional Platforms to Messenger RNA (mRNA) Technologies.

Bhupendra Pawar, Subha Loganathan, Karthik Mukkatira Belliappa, Leela Bhavani Ranganathan, Komal Pukur Thekdi, Sanket Dadarao Hiware

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bhupendra PawarDepartment of Pharmacology, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, IND.
Subha LoganathanDepartment of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Agricultural Research Station, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University (TNAU), Pattukkottai, IND.
Karthik Mukkatira BelliappaDepartment of Microbiology, Kurunji Venkatramana Gowda (KVG) Medical College and Hospital, Sullia, IND.
Leela Bhavani RanganathanDepartment of Physiology, Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, IND.
Komal Pukur ThekdiDepartment of Community Medicine, Dr. N.D. Desai Faculty of Medical Science and Research, Dharmsinh Desai University, Nadiad, IND.
Sanket Dadarao HiwareDepartment of Anatomy, Graphic Era Institute of Medical Sciences, Dehradun, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The trend of vaccine development over the last few years is that the traditional platform has been abandoned and moved towards newer modalities, and the current COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated this shift. Classical approaches (such as inactivated, live attenuated, and recombinant) can be shown to have reduced the burden of infectious diseases; however, they are also limited by their inability to scale production and prolonged development, as well as cold-chain limitations. The lacks became apparent through the pandemic and drove the demand for more agile, adaptive technology that COVID-19 has highlighted. The current review questions the goal of streamlining the immunization approaches in the face of emerging pathogens through a structured narrative comparison of immunogenicity, safety, efficacy, and platform stability of modern vaccination platforms within a narrative review framework. This analysis is anchored by a narrative synthesis of immunological, regulatory, and clinical literature between 2018 and 2025. Messenger RNA (mRNA)-based vaccines have demonstrated strong immunogenicity and practical efficacy in the real world, as well as varying safety profiles across platforms and the potential of new modalities that will be developed both to treat infectious diseases and to be applied in other contexts. The discussion also dwells upon the flexibility of regulation, unequal distribution, and surveillance-based pharmacovigilance. This review can be used to compile a thoroughly comparative view of modern vaccines, based on bringing together mechanistic insights and implementation barriers, which can guide future innovation and policy reconciliation and global resilience. It makes inferences in support of the more progressive, equity-based paradigm of pandemic preparedness and immunization strategy in the 21st century. This review highlights how mRNA technology has transformed the landscape of vaccinology, offering a foundation for faster, safer, and more equitable global immunization strategies in the post-pandemic era.

Indexed as

adaptive immunitycomparative vaccine efficacymrna vaccine platformsnext-generation immunizationvaccine equity and access

Identifiers

PMID41635346
PMCPMC12862647

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.