ArticleHealth science reports2026
Computer Vision-Guided Automated External Defibrillator System Improves Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Accuracy: A Randomized Crossover Trial.
Article in Health science reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Computer Vision-Guided Automated External Defibrillator System Improves Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Accuracy: A Randomized Crossover Trial.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Establishing AI-driven evaluation standards and human-in-the-loop guidance for digital first aid education: a perspective.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCAs) remain a critical challenge in emergency care, as CPR effectiveness heavily relies on precise chest compressions. We propose a novel CPR guidance system using computer vision to track rescuer motion in real time. This study aims to evaluate the system's efficacy in improving CPR performance, particularly its adaptability to both adult and pediatric populations. Methods: We evaluated a novel CPR navigation system integrated into an Automated External Defibrillator (AED), termed HeartSave M650, which utilizes computer vision to guide CPR quality. A prospective, randomized, crossover trial was conducted comparing HeartSave M650 against the traditional HeartSave M600. In total, 81 volunteers (41 CPR-trained; 40 untrained) stratified into adult ( Results: The primary outcome demonstrated that the M650 significantly improved optimal-depth compressions in adults (60.38% vs. 29.54%, Conclusion: HeartSave M650 improves compression depth accuracy, more than doubling correct performance compared to conventional AEDs. Its ability to reduce over-depth compressions further supports its clinical value in standardizing CPR quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.