ArticlePain reports2026
Coding of mechanical pain by myelinated and unmyelinated nociceptors in human hairy skin.
Article in Pain reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- New insight into RNA biomarkers in neuropathic pain: a clinician-neuroscientist roadmap to translational testing and treatment monitoring a clinical review.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In humans, cutaneous Aβ afferents are traditionally linked to discriminative touch, while pain is attributed to Aδ and C fibers. However, we previously identified thickly myelinated high-threshold mechanoreceptors (Aβ-HTMRs) that encode noxious skin indentations and evoke painful percepts when selectively activated. These afferents also display finely grained receptive fields and resilience to fatigue during sustained stimulation. Objectives: To characterize the tuning properties of A-HTMRs under controlled mechanical stimulation and compare them with C-HTMRs. Methods: We used a robotic stimulation system capable of delivering precise skin indentations across a wide force range (20-1000 mN). Single-unit axonal recordings (microneurography) were obtained from cutaneous afferents of the radial nerve in awake healthy participants. Both low- and high-threshold mechanoreceptors were recorded. Results: Among 39 recorded mechanoreceptive afferents, HTMRs were distinguished by high mechanical thresholds and lack of response to soft brushing, with conduction velocities in the Aβ- and C-fiber ranges. Both A- and C-HTMRs exhibited force-dependent increases in spike count and firing rate, with A-HTMRs showing significantly stronger responses. Principal component analysis revealed distinct separation between A- and C-HTMRs, driven by A-HTMRs' robust high-force responses. Psychophysical testing indicated painful stimuli were often described as "sharp," and selective intraneural microstimulation of a single A-HTMR evoked localized "sharp-stinging" pain projected to its receptive field. Conclusion: Robot-controlled stimulation confirmed both A- and C-HTMRs' role in encoding painful mechanical stimuli. The fast conduction, high firing rates, fine receptive fields, and fatigue resilience of A-HTMRs suggest a specialized nociceptive system capable of conveying rich spatial-temporal information, potentially contributing to protective behaviors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.