ArticleJAMIA open2026
Quality of life analysis in community pharmacy using deep learning and explainability methods.
Article in JAMIA open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The study aimed to develop a deep learning-based model, using global and local explainability methods, to process clinical data collected in community pharmacies and identify the key variables influence health-related quality of life in patients with chronic diseases. Materials and Methods: Data from 347 chronic patients, including 257 variables, were analyzed. Five predictive models were compared using 10-way stratified cross-validation: Gradient Boosting, Random Forest, LightGBM, a fully connected neural network (FCNN), and a set of 5 FCNNs. For interpretability, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) was used for the global importance of variables and Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations (LIME) for the local interpretation of individual cases. Results: The FCNN ensemble achieved the best performance ( Discussion: The findings highlight that deep learning models can capture complex relationships among multiple clinical and psychosocial variables. The combination of SHAP and LIME allows for clinically interpretable results, facilitating personalized decisions in chronic disease care. Furthermore, the accessibility of community pharmacies provides a practical setting for data collection and application of these predictive tools. Conclusions: The study demonstrates the potential of machine learning to support personalized decision-making in the management of chronic diseases from accessible settings such as community pharmacies, identifying the most important factors affecting patients' quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.