ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2025
Impact of endometriotic cystectomy on ovarian reserve function and ovulation induction outcomes in women with endometriosis undergoing assisted reproductive technology.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Influence of endometriosis on the outcomes of assisted reproductive technology in poor ovarian responders with previous implantation failures.Obstetrics & gynecology science · 2026Article
- Direct IVF versus prior laparoscopic cystectomy for ovarian endometrioma ≥4 cm: cumulative live birth rate and implications for fertility preservation - a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aims to evaluate the impact of endometriotic cysts and prior ovarian endometriotic cystectomy on ovarian reserve function in women with endometriosis undergoing assisted reproductive technology. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, 3,517 endometriosis patients receiving Results: Ovarian reserve markers were highest in Group A [AMH: 2.88 (1.64-4.45) ng/mL; AFC: 13 (8.5-17)], followed by Group B [AMH: 2.70 (1.59-4.05) ng/mL; AFC: 11 (7-16)], with both significantly exceeding Group C [AMH: 1.97 (1.02-3.05) ng/mL; AFC: 10 (4-15)] (all P < 0.01). The incidence of DOR was significantly higher in Group C (26.23%) than in Group A (13.56%) and Group B (12.90%) (P < 0.05). The total Gn dose was significantly higher in Groups B and C than in Group A. The number of retrieved oocytes and MII oocytes did not differ significantly between Groups A and B, but both were significantly higher than in Group C (P < 0.01). Conclusions: A history of endometriotic cystectomy is associated with significantly diminished ovarian reserve and poorer ovarian response during controlled ovarian stimulation. These findings highlight the importance of individualized surgical decision-making for reproductive-aged women with endometriomas, weighing potential benefits against the risk of iatrogenic damage to ovarian function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.