ArticleFrontiers in digital health2025
Convolutional automatic identification of B-lines and interstitial syndrome in lung ultrasound images using pre-trained neural networks with feature fusion.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Interstitial/alveolar syndrome (IS) is a condition detectable on lung ultrasound (LUS) that indicates underlying pulmonary or cardiac diseases associated with significant morbidity and increased mortality rates. However, diagnosing IS using LUS can be challenging and time-consuming, and it requires clinical expertise. Methods: In this study, multiple convolutional neural network (CNN) models were trained as binary classifiers to accurately screen for IS in LUS frames by distinguishing between IS-present and healthy cases. The CNN models were initially pre-trained using a generic image dataset to learn general visual features (ImageNet) and then fine-tuned on our specific dataset of 108 LUS clips from 54 patients (27 healthy and 27 with IS, two clips per patient) to perform a binary classification task. Each clip in the dataset was assessed by a clinical sonographer to determine the presence of IS features or confirm healthy lung status. The dataset was split into training (70%), validation (15%), and testing (15%) sets. Results: Following the process of fine-tuning, we successfully extracted features from pre-trained DL models. These extracted features were then utilised to train multiple machine learning (ML) classifiers, resulting in significantly improved accuracy in IS classification compared with the individual CNN models. Advanced visual interpretation techniques such as heatmaps based on gradient-weighted class activation mapping (Grad-CAM) and local interpretable model-agnostic explanations (LIME) were implemented to further analyse the outcomes. The best-trained ML model achieved a test accuracy rate of 98.2%, with specificity, recall, precision, and F1 score values above 97.9%. Conclusion: Our study demonstrates the feasibility of using a pre-trained CNN as a diagnostic tool for IS screening on LUS frames, integrating targeted data filtering, feature extraction, and fusion techniques. The data-filtering technique refines the training dataset by excluding LUS frames that lack IS-related features (e.g., absence of B-lines). Feature fusion combines features learnt from different models or "fused" to enhance overall predictive performance. This study confirms the practicality of using pre-trained CNN models with feature extraction and fusion techniques for screening IS using LUS frames. This represents a noteworthy advancement in improving the efficiency of diagnosis. In the next steps, validation on larger datasets will assess the applicability and robustness of these CNN models in more complex clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.