ReviewCureus2026
Remote Patient Monitoring and the Need for a New Care Model: A Narrative Review of Implementation Challenges.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Challenges of Wearable Biosensors and Ways to Overcome Them.Biosensors · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Remote patient monitoring (RPM) has the potential to replace reactive, clinic-based encounters with preventive, continuous care delivered in patients' homes. However, the adoption of RPM has not kept pace with the global ascendance of telehealth in recent years. This narrative review draws on published literature on RPM since 2010, with an emphasis on barriers to RPM program adoption and implementation in clinical settings. Identified challenges to widespread adoption include data overload, ambiguous clinical responsibility, poor integration into existing workflows, and patient and device usability issues. Though the technology itself is reliable, a clearly defined clinical care model is required to maximise the potential of RPM and prevent overburdening healthcare systems. This narrative review suggests that a protocol-driven model with a tiered escalation plan may be beneficial. Future prospective implementation research is required to evaluate the use of alternative, restructured care models for delivering RPM programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.