Development and Validation of a Nurse-Specific Scale to Assess Influencing Factors in Clinical Practice Guideline Implementation: An i-PARIHS-Based Study.

Lu Liu, Namuna Dallakoti, Wei Cui, Xiangyu Li, Shu Ding, Shan Zhang

Registry-linked trialAbstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nursing management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07441473 (The Effect of a Peer-Supported Video- and Interaction-Based Clinical Orientation Program on Reality Shock and Adaptation During the First Clinical Experience), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

1citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07441473 nacompletednot on this map

The Effect of a Peer-Supported Video- and Interaction-Based Clinical Orientation Program on Reality Shock and Adaptation During the First Clinical Experience

TypeinterventionalSponsorSiirt UniversityRan2026 to 2026Enrolled90ConditionsHealthyArmsPeer-Supported Video and Interactive Clinical Orientation, Routine Clinical Orientation

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

Cross-cultural validation of the Chinese version of the lean management scale for nursing services in hospitals.Frontiers in public health · 2026
Article

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lu LiuSchool of Nursing, Capital Medical University, Beijing, CN 100069, China, ccmu.edu.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-8497-4135

Namuna DallakotiSchool of Nursing, Capital Medical University, Beijing, CN 100069, China, ccmu.edu.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8806-8816

Wei CuiBeijing Medical and Health Service Management and Guidance Center, Beijing Municipal Health Commission, Beijing, CN 101160, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2316-6356

Xiangyu LiNursing Department, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, CN 101118, China, ccmu.edu.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-5697-5745

Shu DingNursing Department, Beijing Chao Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, CN 100020, China, ccmu.edu.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5660-8507

Shan ZhangSchool of Nursing, Capital Medical University, Beijing, CN 100069, China, ccmu.edu.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7426-3597

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Clinical practice guideline (CPG) is essential for improving the quality and consistency of care. However, gaps between guideline recommendations and nursing practice remain, contributing to adverse patient outcomes. A theory-based tool is needed to systematically assess factors that influence nurses' implementation of CPG. Objective: To develop and validate the Methods: Items were generated through a scoping review and refined via two-round Delphi reviews. A pilot survey with 40 nurses and a cross-sectional survey with 1005 nurses from eight tertiary hospitals were conducted. Both classical test theory (CTT) and item response theory (IRT) analyses were performed. Results: A total of 637 valid responses were analyzed. Content validity indices were high (I-CVI: 0.93-1.00; S-CVI/Ave: 0.99). The IRT analysis indicated that the final items demonstrated good discrimination ( Conclusions: The

Indexed as

Guideline AdherenceNursesPractice Guidelines as TopicPsychometricsAdultCross-Sectional StudiesDelphi TechniqueFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnaireshospitalimplementation sciencenursing staffpractice guidelinesscale developmentvalidation

Identifiers

PMID41635895

DOI10.1155/jonm/4584848

PMCPMC12862181

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

NCT07441473ClinicalTrials.gov

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.