ArticleCNS neuroscience & therapeutics2026
Altered Salience-Default Mode Network Dynamics in Subclinical Depression: A Preclustering-Based Co-Activation Pattern Analysis.
Article in CNS neuroscience & therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Altered Salience-Default Mode Network Dynamics in Subclinical Depression: A Preclustering-Based Co-Activation Pattern Analysis.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNeuroimaging studies frequently report aberrant spontaneous brain activity and functional connectivity within core functional networks, including the default mode network (DMN), frontoparietal network (FPN), and salience network (SN) in subclinical depression (SD). However, the dynamic coordination among these networks remains poorly understood, impeding comprehensive elucidation of the underlying neuropathology of SD.
methodsResting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data were collected from subjects with SD (n = 26) and healthy controls (HCs, n = 33). A preclustering-based co-activation pattern method was developed to investigate the dynamic patterns of network coordination. Finally, machine learning analysis was conducted to evaluate the potential of network dynamics for clinical diagnosis.
resultsSubjects with SD exhibited decreased dwell time in the SN and increased transition frequency from the SN to DMN, which was positively correlated with depressive severity. Furthermore, an ensemble learning model based on SN-DMN dynamic features achieved a classification accuracy of 96.44% in distinguishing SD from HC.
conclusionThese findings underscore the potential of altered SN-DMN dynamics as candidates for future neuroimaging markers of SD and support a neurocognitive model whereby altered SN-DMN dynamic coordination makes subjects with SD more prone to internal directed attention biases, thereby contributing to self-related depressive symptoms like rumination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.