Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41636915›Full record

ArticleVeterinary research communications2026

Exploratory identification of intestinal health and productive performance patterns in post-weaning piglets using explainable machine learning.

Julieta María Decundo, Alejandro Duitama Leal, Julián Andrés Salamanca Bernal, Susana Nelly Dieguez, Guadalupe Martínez, Joaquin Mozo, Denisa Soledad Pérez Gaudio, Carlos Alberto Puentes Morales, Alejandro Luis Soraci

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary research communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Julieta María DecundoLaboratorio de Toxicología, Departamento de Fisiopatología, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires, Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil (CIVETAN, UNCPBA-CICPBA- CONICET), Tandil, Argentina. jdecundo@vet.unicen.edu.ar.
Alejandro Duitama LealFundación Universitaria Los Libertadores, Bogotá, Colombia.
Julián Andrés Salamanca BernalFundación Universitaria Los Libertadores, Bogotá, Colombia.
Susana Nelly DieguezLaboratorio de Toxicología, Departamento de Fisiopatología, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires, Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil (CIVETAN, UNCPBA-CICPBA- CONICET), Tandil, Argentina.
Guadalupe MartínezLaboratorio de Toxicología, Departamento de Fisiopatología, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires, Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil (CIVETAN, UNCPBA-CICPBA- CONICET), Tandil, Argentina.
Joaquin MozoLaboratorio de Toxicología, Departamento de Fisiopatología, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires, Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil (CIVETAN, UNCPBA-CICPBA- CONICET), Tandil, Argentina.
Denisa Soledad Pérez GaudioLaboratorio de Toxicología, Departamento de Fisiopatología, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires, Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil (CIVETAN, UNCPBA-CICPBA- CONICET), Tandil, Argentina.
Carlos Alberto Puentes MoralesDepartamento de Matemàticas y Estadìstica, Grupo Signos, Universidad El Bosque, Laboratorio de Soluciones Avanzadas en Virtualización e Inteligencia Artificial (SavIA-Lab), Bogotá, Colombia.
Alejandro Luis SoraciLaboratorio de Toxicología, Departamento de Fisiopatología, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires, Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil (CIVETAN, UNCPBA-CICPBA- CONICET), Tandil, Argentina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Weaning is a critical stage in swine production, characterized by intestinal alterations that affect piglet health and performance. In this study, machine learning techniques were applied to identify joint patterns between gut health and productivity during the first 15 days post-weaning. A total of 103 animals were analyzed using a dataset of 24 histomorphological, biochemical, and productive variables. Among the unsupervised clustering models, K-means (k = 2) achieved the best separation, revealing two groups with significant differences in intestinal parameters (villus height-to-crypt depth ratio, intestinal absorptive area, duodenal maltase activity, butyric, propionic and total volatile fatty acid concentrations) and performance outcomes (body weight at 15 days and average daily gain). Supervised models were subsequently applied as interpretative tools to assess variable relevance, with Random Forest achieving high internal consistency. SHAP analysis indicated that intestinal morphology, enzymatic activity, and microbial metabolites (particularly total volatile fatty acids, propionate, and butyrate) were most strongly associated with cluster classification. These findings highlight coordinated patterns between intestinal function and growth during the early post-weaning period and suggest that such biomarkers may represent potential targets to be explored in future nutritional strategies. Overall, this study demonstrates the potential of integrating unsupervised explainable machine learning approaches into animal science research for exploratory analysis and hypothesis generation.

Indexed as

IntestinesMachine LearningSus scrofaAnimalsClustering AlgorithmsFemaleSwineWeaningGut healthMachine learningPigletsWeaning

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.