ArticleClinical & experimental metastasis2026
Gamma knife radiosurgery for cerebellar brain metastases: clinical outcomes and artificial intelligence-based predictive modeling.
Article in Clinical & experimental metastasis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- AI for prognosis and treatment stratification in glioblastoma neurosurgery: a systematic review.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Predicting time to local failure after gamma knife radiosurgery for melanoma brain metastases using survival machine learning.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Article
- Local control and dose selection for lung cancer brain metastases treated with radiosurgery: an artificial intelligence model.Clinical & experimental metastasis · 2026Article
- Clinical GBM hybrid artificial intelligence for prescription dose recommendation and outcome prediction after gamma knife radiosurgery treatment: a proof-of-concept.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cerebellar brain metastases pose unique management challenges due to the risk of rapid neurological deterioration. Resection is often considered for large posterior fossa tumors. Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) is an established treatment for intracranial metastases, yet data dedicated to posterior fossa tumors remain limited. We retrospectively analyzed 490 patients harboring 1296 cerebellar metastases treated with GKRS between 2014 and 2024. Demographic, tumor, and dosimetry variables were collected. Overall survival (OS), local control (LC), and treatment-related toxicity were evaluated. Subgroup analyses examined tumors ≥ 10 cc. In parallel, a feedforward neural network (FNN) was developed to predict the appropriate prescription dose expected to result in the best OS, and LC for a specific patient. Across the cohort, LC was 82.5%, median OS was 10.2 months. Immunotherapy significantly improved OS (13.5 vs. 8.1 months, p < 0.001) and LC (89.4% vs. 78.1%, p = 0.012). Tumors ≥ 10 cc (n = 72) achieved outcomes comparable to smaller tumors, with OS of 11.1 months, LC of 80.6%, and minimal toxicity. Immunotherapy further improved survival and LC in this subgroup. Tumor progression was managed with repeat SRS for 10%, resection for 5%, and WBRT for 2% tumors. The FNN achieved strong predictive performance (R2 = 0.81 for dose, R2 = 0.77 for OS, AUC = 0.83 for LC), demonstrating feasibility of artificial intelligence for radiosurgical planning. GKRS provides safe and effective treatment for cerebellar metastases, including large tumors. This is the first study to integrate an FNN for outcome prediction in Gamma Knife radiosurgery, establishing a foundation for personalized, data-driven neurosurgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41636953What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.