Evidence mapPaperPMID 41636953Full record

ArticleClinical & experimental metastasis2026

Gamma knife radiosurgery for cerebellar brain metastases: clinical outcomes and artificial intelligence-based predictive modeling.

Jheremy S Reyes, Alexandros Bouras, Constantinos G Hadjipanayis, L Dade Lunsford, Ajay Niranjan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & experimental metastasis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Predicting time to local failure after gamma knife radiosurgery for melanoma brain metastases using survival machine learning.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jheremy S ReyesDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Center for Image-Guided Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC), Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Alexandros BourasDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Center for Image-Guided Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC), Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Constantinos G HadjipanayisDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Center for Image-Guided Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC), Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
L Dade LunsfordDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Center for Image-Guided Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC), Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Ajay NiranjanDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Center for Image-Guided Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC), Pittsburgh, PA, USA. niraax@upmc.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cerebellar brain metastases pose unique management challenges due to the risk of rapid neurological deterioration. Resection is often considered for large posterior fossa tumors. Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) is an established treatment for intracranial metastases, yet data dedicated to posterior fossa tumors remain limited. We retrospectively analyzed 490 patients harboring 1296 cerebellar metastases treated with GKRS between 2014 and 2024. Demographic, tumor, and dosimetry variables were collected. Overall survival (OS), local control (LC), and treatment-related toxicity were evaluated. Subgroup analyses examined tumors ≥ 10 cc. In parallel, a feedforward neural network (FNN) was developed to predict the appropriate prescription dose expected to result in the best OS, and LC for a specific patient. Across the cohort, LC was 82.5%, median OS was 10.2 months. Immunotherapy significantly improved OS (13.5 vs. 8.1 months, p < 0.001) and LC (89.4% vs. 78.1%, p = 0.012). Tumors ≥ 10 cc (n = 72) achieved outcomes comparable to smaller tumors, with OS of 11.1 months, LC of 80.6%, and minimal toxicity. Immunotherapy further improved survival and LC in this subgroup. Tumor progression was managed with repeat SRS for 10%, resection for 5%, and WBRT for 2% tumors. The FNN achieved strong predictive performance (R2 = 0.81 for dose, R2 = 0.77 for OS, AUC = 0.83 for LC), demonstrating feasibility of artificial intelligence for radiosurgical planning. GKRS provides safe and effective treatment for cerebellar metastases, including large tumors. This is the first study to integrate an FNN for outcome prediction in Gamma Knife radiosurgery, establishing a foundation for personalized, data-driven neurosurgery.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCerebellar NeoplasmsRadiosurgeryAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeArtificial intelligenceCerebellar metastasesGamma knife radiosurgeryImmunotherapyPrognosis

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.