ArticleJournal of molecular neuroscience : MN2026
Resolving Heterogeneity in the Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease and its Progression Using Multimodal Data.
Article in Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a complex and diverse illness that makes early detection extremely difficult. Most existing research utilizes data to identify biomarkers and more homogeneous subgroups to improve the detection, prediction of progression, and prognosis of AD. However, AD still suffers from a lack of appropriate biomarkers for early symptom detection and blurred boundaries between different subgroups. Here, an unsupervised clustering method known as similarity network fusion (SNF) was employed to analyze multimodal data from 972 subjects, including 370 with cognitively normal (CN), 565 with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and 37 patients with AD. First, we constructed a similarity network for subjects using cognitive scores, genetics, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) related data, respectively. Then the SNF fusion method was employed to integrate the data, and spectral clustering was used to find subgroups sharing similarities across modalities. Our results indicated that the approach accurately diagnosed both current and prospective AD (~ 90%). Notably, we successfully identified two MCI subtypes with biological and clinical significance, validated by longitudinal studies of cognitive, clinical, fluid biomarkers and MRI-related features, dementia diagnosis, and pseudo-trajectory analysis. We also observed many dysregulated processes and signaling pathways between MCI subtypes, such as the GnRH signaling pathway, VEGF signaling pathway, and insulin signaling pathway. Overall, our research offers a distinctive viewpoint on the diversity of AD, and the more specific subtypes of MCI help create customized treatment plans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.