ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2026
Comparative evaluation of Savanna HSV 1+2/VZV multiplex assay and Simplexa HSV 1&2 and VZV direct kits for rapid molecular detection of HSV-1, HSV-2, and VZV.
Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Herpes simplex virus (HSV-1 and HSV-2) and varicella-zoster virus (VZV) cause cutaneous and mucocutaneous lesions. Primary infection and secondary reactivations affect the mouth, genitalia, and dermis at other bodily regions. Accurate clinical diagnosis without laboratory confirmation can be difficult since lesions caused by these viruses are nondescript, and areas of bodily infection can overlap. Rapid molecular test results have been shown to reduce the time to definitive diagnosis, providing additional opportunities for patient counseling, antiviral therapy, and appropriate infection prevention measures. A molecular, multiplexed HSV + VZV assay allows both viruses to be tested simultaneously from a single lesion swab. This could potentially enhance diagnostic accuracy through laboratory confirmation, thus minimizing dependence on clinical judgment alone. The recently Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved Savanna HSV 1+2/VZV multiplex assay has not been widely evaluated against other FDA-approved assays. This is the first report evaluating the clinical performance of the Savanna HSV 1+2/VZV assay compared to independent assays for HSV and VZV. Results indicated that the Savanna HSV 1+2/VZV assay was comparable to the Diasorin Simplexa HSV 1&2 Direct and VZV Direct assays.IMPORTANCELesion-causing viruses, herpes simplex (HSV-1 and HSV-2) and varicella-zoster virus (VZV), are common and difficult to distinguish clinically. Each can be found over any area of the body but have different treatment regimens and considerations for infectivity and future outbreak management. Laboratory analysis by molecular assay is the gold standard for these viruses, but it can take hours to days and is reliant on the clinician choosing the correct virus to test the first time, or risk being outside the treatment window. A rapid molecular assay that detects all three viruses simultaneously was developed and recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Here, we provide data highlighting the clinical performance of the Savanna HSV 1+2/VZV assay and its ability to detect across anatomical locations and ages. These data indicate that the Savanna assay is comparable to individual assays for each viral target, providing the opportunity for enhanced diagnostic accuracy of lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.