Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41637597›Full record

ReviewBulletin of the Hospital for Joint Disease (2013)2025

A simplified algorithm to work up graft re-rupture following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Andrew S Bi, Mark A Pianka, Daniel J Kaplan, Eric J Strauss, Laith M Jazrawi, Michael J Alaia

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bulletin of the Hospital for Joint Disease (2013), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Andrew S BiDivision of Sports Medicine, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, New York.
Mark A Pianka
Daniel J Kaplan
Eric J Strauss
Laith M Jazrawi
Michael J Alaia

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractThe need to perform revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) has several etiologies such as infection, arthrofibrosis, cyclops lesions, and graft failure, which should be distinguished before revision ACLR. Even the definition of graft failure varies within the literature. ACLR graft failure falls into modifiable, surgeon-controlled factors, such as tunnel position, graft choice, and alignment, and nonmodifiable factors, such as patient age, tissue quality, or secondary traumatic reruptures. In this review, we describe a facile framework for the workup of modifiable ACLR graft failure.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAnterior Cruciate LigamentAnterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesAnterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansReoperationRisk Factorsanterior cruciate ligamentanterolateral ligament complexcoronal alignmentfemoral tunnelposterior tibial sloperevision ACLtibial tunneltunnel osteolysis

Identifiers

PMID41637597
PMCPMC12742499

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.