Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41638880›Full record

ReviewEuropean respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society2026

Cellular plasticity and regenerative mechanisms in the lung.

Laure-Emmanuelle Zaragosi, Isabelle Salwig, Roxana-Maria Wasnick, Mareike Lehmann, Ana Pardo-Saganta

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Repairing the lung: from single cells and tissue organisation to regenerative therapy - highlights of the Lung Science Conference 2025.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Laure-Emmanuelle ZaragosiInstitut de Pharmacologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, Université Côte d'Azur and Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Valbonne, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6747-7928
Isabelle SalwigMax-Planck-Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Member of the Excellence Cluster Cardio-Pulmonary Institute (CPI), Bad Nauheim, Germany.
Roxana-Maria WasnickComprehensive Pneumology Center (CPC), Institute of Lung Health and Immunity (LHI), Helmholtz Munich, Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Munich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1114-7799
Mareike LehmannComprehensive Pneumology Center (CPC), Institute of Lung Health and Immunity (LHI), Helmholtz Munich, Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Munich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8601-8206
Ana Pardo-SagantaInstitute for Lung Health (ILH), Department of Internal Medicine, Justus-Liebig University, Universities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Giessen, Germany Ana.Pardo-Saganta@innere.med.uni-giessen.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The adult lung is continuously exposed to environmental insults such as pathogens, pollutants and toxins, necessitating robust regenerative mechanisms to maintain tissue integrity and function. Epithelial regeneration relies on the activity and plasticity of resident stem and progenitor cell populations that are spatially distributed across airway and alveolar compartments. Basal cells in the conducting airways and alveolar type (AT) 2 cells in the alveoli act as regional stem cells, capable of self-renewal and multilineage differentiation. Additionally, variant club cells, bronchioalveolar stem cells (BASCs) and newly identified secretory and transitional cell types such as respiratory airway secretory and AT0 cells have emerged as critical players in lung repair. Cellular plasticity, the ability of differentiated cells to dedifferentiate or transdifferentiate, enables rapid adaptation to injury but may also contribute to chronic lung disease when dysregulated. Ageing and chronic injury reduce regenerative capacities, leading to failed repair, fibrotic remodelling or epithelial simplification, as seen in diseases such as idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and COPD. Recent advances in single-cell and spatial transcriptomics have revealed cellular heterogeneity, novel progenitor states and transitional intermediates that underpin both normal repair and disease pathogenesis. In this review, we integrate findings from animal models and human lung studies to highlight conserved and divergent mechanisms governing cell fate decisions. We discuss how niche signals, transcriptional programmes and extrinsic cues shape epithelial regeneration and explore the therapeutic implications of targeting epithelial plasticity in chronic lung disease.

Indexed as

Airway RemodelingCell PlasticityLungLung DiseasesRegenerationStem CellsAnimalsCell DifferentiationCell LineageCell ProliferationHumansPhenotypeSignal TransductionStem Cell Niche

Identifiers

PMID41638880
PMCPMC12871054

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.