ArticleAnnals of hematology2026
Daratumumab-based first-line therapy benefit multiple myeloma patients in a real-world setting: a multi-center retrospective propensity score-match study.
Article in Annals of hematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The role of targeted therapy in the management of colorectal cancer liver metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
27 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAdding daratumumab to initial therapy in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) enhances deep remission and prolongs progression-free survival (PFS). Given the differences between trial-eligible and real-world patients, and healthcare access variability in developing countries, real-world data are essential to complement RCT evidence.
methodsWe analyzed 761 newly diagnosed MM patients treated with (n = 177) or without (n = 584) daratumumab as first-line therapy from 2017 to 2023 across southern China. Propensity score matching (PSM) generated cohorts of 158 and 278 patients, respectively, matched for stage, cytogenetic abnormalities, and regimen type. Responses were evaluated per International Myeloma Working Group criteria, and measurable residual disease (MRD) was assessed via next-generation multiparameter flow cytometry.
resultsThe daratumumab group demonstrated significantly higher rates of ≥ very good partial response (85.0% vs. 61.3%; P < 0.001) and MRD negativity (73.0% vs. 51.9%; P = 0.024) at the end of induction. Additionally, 3-year PFS (75.6% vs. 55.0%, hazard ratio [HR] 0.49, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.36-0.66, P < 0.001) and overall survival (OS) rates (78.3% vs. 74.4%; HR 0.56 [95% CI 0.36-0.86], P = 0.008) were superior in the daratumumab group, and these results remained consistent after PSM. Daratumumab improved PFS in patients with gain/amp(1q21) but not in those with del17p or t(4;14). Survival benefit was also observed in the addition of daratumumab to bortezomib/lenalidomide/dexamethasone combined treatment subgroup.
conclusionIn real-world settings, daratumumab-based first-line therapy improved the depth of response, PFS, and OS, though not all patients benefited.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.