ArticleOecologia2026
Divergent demographic responses of boreal-breeding ducks to growing season variability.
Article in Oecologia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In seasonal environments climatic variability shapes the timing, duration, and magnitude of primary production with effects that may percolate upward through food chains. While the role of spring phenology and implications of trophic mismatches have been documented in some bird species, including waterfowl, there is little research on the role of growing season duration or overall productivity. Duck species breeding in the western boreal forest (WBF) of North America vary widely in their average timing and plasticity for breeding dates, which may set up differing sensitivity to spring phenology. In contrast, increases in growing season duration and productivity may positively impact species regardless of life history through the extension of the breeding season and bottom-up trophic enrichment. We tested these hypotheses using breeding population estimates for 8 species (or species groups) of ducks and normalized difference vegetation index to infer spring phenology, length of growing season, and growing season productivity for duck survey areas in the WBF, 1982-2019. Spring phenology had mixed effects on species' population growth rates, and effects were generally not consistent with mediation by average breeding dates or plasticity. Length of season and productivity effects showed some species' population growth rates decreasing following longer seasons or higher productivity, opposite our predictions. These results suggest that, for secondary consumers like ducks, the role of growing season characteristics may be mediated or superseded by more complex biotic and abiotic interactions than can be explained with simple annual summaries of growing season characteristics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.