Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41639429›Full record

ArticleCommunications medicine2026

A computationally frugal, open-source chest CT foundation model for thoracic disease detection in lung cancer screening programmes.

Niccolò McConnell, Pardeep Vasudev, Daisuke Yamada, Daryl Cheng, Mehran Azimbagirad, John McCabe, Shahab Aslani, Ahmed H Shahin, Yukun Zhou, SUMMIT Consortium and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Niccolò McConnellHawkes Institute, University College London, London, UK. niccolo.mcconnell.17@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-4966-4737
Pardeep VasudevHawkes Institute, University College London, London, UK.
Daisuke YamadaHawkes Institute, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1561-5908
Daryl ChengHawkes Institute, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9906-4298
Mehran AzimbagiradHawkes Institute, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6321-7643
John McCabeHawkes Institute, University College London, London, UK.
Shahab AslaniHawkes Institute, University College London, London, UK.
Ahmed H ShahinHawkes Institute, University College London, London, UK.
Yukun ZhouHawkes Institute, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0840-6422
SUMMIT Consortium
Andre AltmannHawkes Institute, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9265-2393
Yipeng HuDepartment of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4902-0486
Paul TaylorInstitute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6296-2948
Sam M JanesDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6634-5939
Daniel C AlexanderHawkes Institute, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2439-350X
Joseph JacobHawkes Institute, University College London, London, UK. j.jacob@ucl.ac.uk.

Funding

Cancer Research UK (CRUK) C11496/ A30025Cancer Research UK (CRUK) EDDCPGM\100002LUNGevity Foundation (LUNGevity) SU2C-AACR-DT23-17RCUK | Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) EP/S021612/1RCUK | MRC | Medical Research Foundation MR/W025051/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust (Wellcome) 227835/Z/23/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLow-dose computed tomography (LDCT) employed in lung cancer screening (LCS) programmes is increasing in uptake worldwide. LCS programmes herald a generational opportunity to simultaneously detect cancer and non-cancer-related early-stage lung disease, yet these efforts are hampered by a shortage of radiologists to interpret scans at scale. Here, we present TANGERINE, a computationally frugal, open-source vision foundation model for volumetric LDCT analysis.

methodsDesigned for broad accessibility and rapid adaptation, TANGERINE can be fine-tuned off the shelf for a wide range of disease-specific tasks with limited computational resources and training data. The model is pretrained using self-supervised learning on more than 98,000 thoracic LDCT scans, including the United Kingdom's largest LCS initiative to date and 27 public datasets. By extending a masked autoencoder framework to three-dimensional imaging, TANGERINE provides a scalable solution for LDCT analysis, combining architectural simplicity, public availability, and modest computational requirements.

resultsTANGERINE demonstrates superior computational and data efficiency in a retrospective multi-dataset analysis: it converges rapidly during fine-tuning, requiring significantly fewer graphics processing unit hours than models trained from scratch, and achieves comparable or superior performance using only a fraction of the fine-tuning data. The model achieves strong performance across 14 disease classification tasks, including lung cancer and multiple respiratory diseases, and generalises robustly across diverse clinical centres.

conclusionsTANGERINE's accessible, open-source, lightweight design lays the foundation for rapid integration into next-generation medical imaging tools, enabling lung cancer screening programmes to pivot from a singular focus on lung cancer detection toward comprehensive respiratory disease management in high-risk populations.

Identifiers

PMID41639429
PMCPMC12876872

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.