ArticleBMC infectious diseases2026
Sustained regression of a tislelizumab-reactivated tuberculous focus after short-course therapy: a case report.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are considered potential risk factors for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI). Radiologically stable, inactive tuberculous focus activation provides particularly compelling evidence for this association. While a complete course of antituberculosis treatment is unequivocally recommended for conventional active tuberculosis, the management of ICI-activated tuberculosis lacks consensus and poses a particularly significant therapeutic dilemma, especially when combination therapy with anticancer agents results in severe adverse effects. CASE PRESENTATION: A 69-year-old man with stage IV lung squamous cell carcinoma and a long-term radiologically stable, untreated pulmonary tuberculous focus underwent chemoimmunotherapy with paclitaxel, carboplatin, and tislelizumab. The malignant mass regressed after four cycles, but the previously stable tuberculous focus was reactivated, as confirmed by next-generation sequencing. Anti-tuberculosis therapy is complicated by severe synergistic toxicity with chemotherapy, leading the patient to self-discontinue after two months. Notably, the reactivated granulomatous lesion regressed to its original baseline size without a full course of anti-TB treatment. The patient continued tislelizumab maintenance, and both lesions remained stable at the 10-month follow-up.
conclusionThis case suggests that a short course of anti-TB therapy aimed at reducing the bacterial burden may constitute a viable management strategy for ICI-induced reactivation of a stable TB focus, potentially enabling the safe continuation of ICIs. This observation challenges the conventional requirement for a complete anti-TB course in this specific scenario and suggests a personalized management approach on the basis of the dynamic balance between bacterial load and host immunity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.