ArticleLipids in health and disease2026
Decoding calcific aortic valve disease: superior predictive power of time-weighted lipoprotein(a).
Article in Lipids in health and disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCalcific aortic valve disease (CAVD) is a cardiovascular disease closely associated with aging. The role of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] has attracted considerable attention in recent years. However, limited research has simultaneously explored the relationships between Lp(a), age, and CAVD. This study sought to assess the relationship linking Lp(a), time-weighted Lp(a), and CAVD.
methodsA total of 5,156 inpatients with comprehensive clinical data were recruited for this study. The associations of Lp(a) and time-weighted Lp(a) with CAVD were examined via multivariate logistic regression analysis, alongside the application of restricted cubic spline analysis. The diagnostic utility of Lp(a) and time-weighted Lp(a) for CAVD was assessed by constructing receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.
resultsCAVD prevalence rose with age, whereas the rate of increase diminished with advancing age. The average Lp(a) level in the young populations with CAVD was more than twice that in the No-CAVD group, particularly among those aged 55 years or younger. The prevalence of CAVD in non-elderly populations was markedly 2–4 fold greater in the higher Lp(a) group (> 30 mg/dL) than in the lower Lp(a) group (≤ 30 mg/dL). Multivariate adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for CAVD increased with advancing Lp(a) or age. Time-weighted Lp(a), which takes into account both age and Lp(a), was more strongly linked to elevated CAVD risk than Lp(a) alone. Time-weighted Lp(a) enhanced the diagnostic value of CAVD, improving both sensitivity and specificity.
conclusionsThe risk of CAVD is strongly associated with both age and elevated Lp(a) levels. Time-weighted Lp(a), which integrates these factors, serves as a superior indicator that better captures cumulative long-term Lp(a) variation and yields stronger CAVD risk stratification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.