ArticleBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2026
Association between aerobic exercise and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) concentration in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Article in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Muscle and mind: rewiring cognitive-motor recovery through exercise-responsive neurophysiology in neurological populations.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the effect of aerobic exercise on circulating vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) levels in adults, given the inconsistent results in randomized controlled trials (RCTs), which is the basis for our investigation.
methodsA comprehensive search of ISI Web of Science, PubMed/MEDLINE, and Scopus was conducted up to May 2025. Thirteen RCTs satisfied eligibility criteria. We performed a random-effects meta-analysis to estimate the overall Standrad mean difference (SMD) in VEGF between aerobic exercise group and control group. We conducted subgroup analyses dated on exercise intensity, duration, and biological sample (serum versus plasma).
resultsThe results of the pooled analysis demonstrated no significant overall effect of aerobic exercise on circulating VEGF levels ) SMD: - 0.075; 95% CI: - 0.246 to 0.096; p = 0.390; I
conclusionsIt appears that aerobic exercise does not have significant overall influence on circulating VEGF levels. However, VEGF reductions may subsequently occur after short-duration interventions. Further research is needed with larger high-quality RCTs to verify these associations and further explore the mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.