ReviewFrontiers in oncology2025
Efficacy and safety of BTK inhibitors in Richter's transformation: a systematic review of clinical evidence.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Richter's transformation (RT) is an aggressive progression of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) or small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL), most commonly to diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Therapeutic options are limited, and outcomes are poor, particularly in relapsed or refractory cases. Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors have transformed the treatment landscape of CLL, but their role in RT is less well defined. Methods: We conducted a systematic review in accordance with PRISMA guidelines to evaluate the efficacy and safety of BTK inhibitor-based therapies in patients with RT. PubMed, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched through January 1, 2025. Clinical trials reporting outcomes such as overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs) in RT patients treated with BTK inhibitors were included. Results: Seven studies (six clinical trials and one case series) comprising 220 patients were included. Monotherapy with pirtobrutinib and acalabrutinib showed ORRs of 50% and 40%, respectively. Combination regimens such as zanubrutinib plus tislelizumab and ibrutinib plus nivolumab demonstrated ORRs ranging from 41.6% to 65%, with improved outcomes in treatment-naïve patients. Safety profiles were generally manageable, though grade ≥3 AEs, particularly cytopenias and infections, were common. Risk of bias was moderate to serious across studies due to non-randomized designs and small sample sizes. Conclusion: BTK inhibitor-based therapies show promising efficacy in patients with RT, particularly in combination with immunotherapeutic agents. While monotherapy may offer a tolerable option for frail patients, combination regimens may improve outcomes in select populations. Larger, randomized controlled trials are needed to better define the role of BTK inhibition in this high-risk disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.