ArticleCardiology research and practice2026
Associations of Inflammatory Markers and Coronary Heart Disease in Different Gender Groups in Cohort NHANES 2003-2018.
Article in Cardiology research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Associations of Inflammatory Markers and Coronary Heart Disease in Different Gender Groups in Cohort NHANES 2003-2018.Cardiology research and practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Although previous studies have revealed the correlation between inflammatory markers and coronary heart disease (CHD), this study aims to explore the relationship between inflammatory markers and CHD in the male and female population, respectively. Methods: This study includes participants from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 2003 to 2018. Inflammatory markers included the following: systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR). Multivariate logistic regression was performed to investigate the correlation between these inflammatory markers and CHD. The trend test was employed to examine potential linear trend associations, and the restricted cubic splines (RCSs) were utilized to depict nonlinear relationships. Results: The NHANES database including 40,177 participants was stratified into two cohorts: the CHD group ( Conclusions: Our study revealed that LMR, PLR, and SII are significantly negative correlative markers of CHD in males, while LMR and NLR are more accurate predictors of CHD in females.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.