SynthesisFrontiers in pharmacology2025
The effect of plant active substances on cognitive function in healthy older adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: With the accelerating global population aging, age-related cognitive decline has become a significant health concern for the older adults. The limited efficacy and common side effects of pharmacological interventions have made the exploration of safe non-pharmacological strategies an urgent need. Plant active substances have drawn much attention due to their multi-target neuroprotective properties, there is a lack of systematic comparative research on cognitive function in healthy older adults. Objective: To assess the effects of plant active substances on various domains of cognitive function in healthy older adults through a network meta-analysis (NMA). Methods: Comprehensive searches were conducted in Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science (up to 31 December 2024). Primary outcomes included learning and memory, complex attention, executive function, language, and perceptual-motor skills. NMA was performed using Stata 15.1, with cumulative ranking curve area (SUCRA) for intervention ranking; consistency and publication bias were examined. Results: After screening, 25 eligible studies with 1861 healthy older adults, evaluating 10 plant active substances, were included. Specifically, 23 studies included learning and memory functions, 18 studies included complex attention, 16 studies included executive functions, 4 studies included language functions, and 3 studies included perceptual-motor functions. The research results showed that based on the SUCRA values, raisins (95.1%) and tart cherry (89.5%) were the most likely to be the best intervention for improving learning and memory functions. The bacopa monnieri compound (91.3%), curcumin (89.3%), and tart cherry (88.9%) ranked in the top three in the executive function domain. Bacopa monnieri compound (93%) and raisin (80.7%) ranked in the language function category. Guarana (90.3%) had the highest probability in the perceptual-motor domain. The intervention effects on complex attention functions were generally limited. Conclusion: The NMA results indicate that in terms of learning and memory functions, raisin and tart cherry ranked higher; in terms of executive functions, the bacopa monnieri compound demonstrated a relatively better intervention effect, providing an important basis for non-drug interventions for cognitive health in the healthy older adults. Future research should focus on long-term safety, dosage optimization, and synergistic mechanisms to promote functional food development. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CDR420251032046.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.