ReviewCureus2026
Pre-clinical Evaluation of Shilajit in Cancer: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Shilajit, an Ayurvedic herbo-mineral preparation containing fulvic acids and humic substances, has been studied for its anti-cancer potential; however, a precise summary of experimental evidence is not available. The purpose of this systematic review and qualitative synthesis was to analyse the preclinical and clinical evidence on the anticancer potential, mechanisms, and translational prospects of Shilajit. PubMed, Ovid Discovery, and Google Scholar were searched systematically, and only nine preclinical studies met predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. No clinical studies were eligible. Data on cytotoxicity, mechanisms of action, and selectivity were extracted by two independent reviewers. These included studies (eight in vitro and one in vivo osteosarcoma model) analysed the effect of Shilajit on various types of cancer. Despite differences in methodologies, all studies reported dose-dependent cytotoxicity with IC₅₀ values ranging from 31 to 1103 µg/mL for various cancer types, depending on the type of cancer and form of Shilajit preparation. Selectivity against cancer cells was observed as compared to normal cell lines. Molecularly, Shilajit mediated apoptosis through the generation of reactive oxygen species and inhibition of NF-κ B (Nuclear Factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells)/IKK (I-kappa-B kinase) signaling, as well as suppression of epithelial-mesenchymal transition and cell cycle arrest. In vivo findings suggested chemopotentiation and organ protection when administered together with standard therapy. Thus, Shilajit shows multitargeted anticancer activities in various experimental cancer models by several mechanisms. This evidence is preclinical, and standardization issues restrict clinical translation. The results support continued investigation through rigorous, blinded studies, recognising that no clinical trials currently exist and that any potential clinical translation remains speculative at this stage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.