Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41640958›Full record

Trial reportWorld journal of hepatology2026

Evaluation of the impact of an interdisciplinary team scheduling model on psychological outcomes in patients with decompensated cirrhosis.

Wei-Ying Xu, Ye-Qin Li, Xiu-Ping Wei, Hai-Ping Qin, Li-Fan Feng

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in World journal of hepatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Wei-Ying XuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Red Cross Hospital of Yulin City, Yulin 537000, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China.
Ye-Qin LiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Red Cross Hospital of Yulin City, Yulin 537000, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China. liyeqin183@163.com.
Xiu-Ping WeiDepartment of Nursing, Red Cross Hospital of Yulin City, Yulin 537000, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China.
Hai-Ping QinDepartment of Gastroenterology, Red Cross Hospital of Yulin City, Yulin 537000, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China.
Li-Fan FengDepartment of Gastroenterology, Red Cross Hospital of Yulin City, Yulin 537000, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with decompensated cirrhosis frequently experience severe psychological distress, anxiety, and depression, yet psychological support is often fragmented in conventional care.

aimTo investigate the effect of interdisciplinary team scheduling on psychological outcomes in decompensated cirrhosis.

methodsA randomized, single-blind, single-center trial was conducted from January 2022 to December 2024 in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region. A total of 110 patients with decompensated cirrhosis (Distress Thermometer ≥ 4) were randomized to interdisciplinary team scheduling (

resultsFollowing the intervention, the interdisciplinary group achieved significantly lower psychological distress [3 (2-3)

conclusionThe interdisciplinary team scheduling model effectively alleviates psychological symptoms and enhances quality of life among patients with decompensated cirrhosis. This model addresses unmet psychosocial needs through early, continuous, and collaborative care, providing a practical framework for integrating psychological support into chronic liver disease management.

Indexed as

Chronic disease managementDecompensated cirrhosisInterdisciplinary collaborative teamNursing scheduling modelPatient-centered carePsychological outcome indicators

Identifiers

PMID41640958
PMCPMC12865429

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.