ArticleParasite (Paris, France)2026
Glossina from the Republic of the Congo: species identification by MALDI-TOF MS and research of associated micro-organisms.
Article in Parasite (Paris, France), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Human African trypanosomiasis (HAT) and Animal African trypanosomiasis (AAT), transmitted by Glossina species, remain major health and economic burdens in Africa. Accurate vector identification is essential for effective control strategies. However, current identification methods of Glossina species based on morphological and/or molecular techniques have several limitations that often hinder reliable species-level classification. This study assessed matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) as an alternative or complementary approach to morphological and molecular methods for Glossina species identification and explored its ability to detect infection status. A total of 265 tsetse flies were collected and morphologically classified into the Glossina palpalis group (n = 200) and the Glossina fuscipes group (n = 65), later confirmed by molecular analysis as Glossina palpalis palpalis and Glossina fuscipes quanzensis, respectively. Spectra were generated from wings, legs, and thoraxes to identify the most suitable body parts. For G. p. palpalis, high-quality spectra were obtained from wings (98.0%), legs (96.5%), and thoraxes (93.5%); for G. f. quanzensis, corresponding values were 89.2%, 87.7%, and 72.3%. Blind testing showed that 89.5% of spectra for G. p. palpalis and 95.2% for G. f. quanzensis matched morphological identification, with 87.0% and 94.6%, respectively, reaching relevant score thresholds. Molecular screening detected Trypanosoma congolense DNA in nine specimens, but MALDI-TOF MS spectra could not distinguish infected from uninfected flies. These findings demonstrate that MALDI-TOF MS is a rapid, reliable tool for Glossina species identification, particularly using wings and legs, but is unsuitable for infection status determination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.