ArticleInternational ophthalmology2026
Complications of minimally invasive surgery for primary open-angle glaucoma in patients with diabetic retinopathy: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in International ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveMinimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) has become increasingly popular for treating primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). However, data regarding complications for patients with comorbid diabetic retinopathy (DR) are limited. This study aimed to compare complications after MIGS in POAG patients with and without DR.
methodsThis is a retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX global health network. Adult patients with POAG who underwent MIGS were identified, with one group having comorbid DR and the other without. Propensity score matching was applied, yielding 518 patients per group for analysis. Complications assessed included vision loss, hypotony, ocular hypertension, cataract formation, eye infection, and any ocular hemorrhage. The primary outcomes were post-procedure complication rates and their statistical significance. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed.
resultsPatients with DR who underwent MIGS had a higher risk for vision loss (32.8% vs. 24.4%, HR 1.443, 95% CI 1.13-1.841) and ocular hemorrhage (13.4% vs. 4.3%, HR 3.194, 95% CI 1.929-5.288) compared to those without DR. Cataract formation rates were lower in DR patients at 3 months (44.4% vs. 50.6%, p = 0.046) and 6 months (53.3% vs. 59.5%, p = 0.048) post-surgery. No significant differences were observed in rates of hypotony, ocular hypertension, or eye infection.
conclusionMIGS in patients with DR is associated with an increased risk of post-procedure complications, particularly vision loss and ocular hemorrhage. These findings can aid in the clinical management and counseling of patients with both POAG and DR considering MIGS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.