Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41642820›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Self-perceived far vision quality and night driving difficulties are not related to night myopia or visual acuity.

Andrés Gené-Sampedro, Javier Gene-Morales, Francisco Alonso, Susana Montecelo Salvado, Sergio A Useche

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andrés Gené-SampedroINTRAS (Research Institute on Traffic and Road Safety), University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0661-7805
Javier Gene-MoralesINTRAS (Research Institute on Traffic and Road Safety), University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5901-5245
Francisco AlonsoINTRAS (Research Institute on Traffic and Road Safety), University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Susana Montecelo SalvadoCenter for Neurosciences and Medical Research, Essilor International, affiliate of EssilorLuxottica, Paris, France.
Sergio A UsecheINTRAS (Research Institute on Traffic and Road Safety), University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5099-4627

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to psychometrically validate the Night Drive Questionnaire (NDQ), a new tool designed to assess self-reported far vision quality and difficulties related to night driving. Additionally, we evaluated the questionnaire's potential for detecting and characterizing night myopia at an early stage. A total of 115 drivers, aged between 18 and 63 years (53% female), who regularly drove at night, completed the Night Drive Questionnaire (NDQ). Participants also had their refraction shift (night myopia) and visual acuity shift measured. Both refraction and visual acuity shift were calculated as the difference between the mesopic (low light) and photopic (normal light) measurements. We evaluated the 1) psychometric qualities through exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, and 2) concurrent validity through correlations (Spearman) between the NDQ factors and night myopia and standard visual acuity shift and comparisons (Welch) between age groups, sexes, and night myopia levels. The NDQ displayed the best psychometric properties with a four-factor adjusted model, which includes: F1 - Quality of Far Vision, F2 - Difficulties in perceiving with central vision, F3 - Difficulties in perceiving with peripheral vision, and F4 - Difficulties in perceiving with the interaction of central and peripheral vision. This model demonstrated acceptable validity, consistency, and reliability indexes. Males compared to females reported fewer difficulties perceiving with central and peripheral vision and the combination of both (all p ≤ 0.011). There were no significant differences in driving difficulties based on age (all p ≥ 0.252) or night myopia groups (all p ≥ 0.242). Additionally, there were non-significant correlations between the factors and either night myopia or visual acuity shift (all p ≥ 0.092). In summary, the results indicate that the NDQ is a valid and reliable tool for measuring self-reported quality of far vision and the visual-related difficulties experienced during night driving, whether related to central, peripheral, or mixed vision. However, it is not effective in detecting or characterizing night myopia. Future studies should assess whether the NDQ is valid for identifying other visual function parameters that are more directly linked to night driving challenges.

Indexed as

Automobile DrivingMyopiaVisual AcuityAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNight VisionPsychometricsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41642820
PMCPMC12875446

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.