ArticlePloS one2026
To treat or not to treat: Experiences and considerations of veterinarians in management of cats with diabetes mellitus.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Veterinarians' daily work involves navigating ethical, medical, and emotional considerations while balancing diverse perceptions of responsible care within the triadic relationship between veterinarian, animal, and owner. These challenges are particularly evident in the management of chronic diseases. Diabetes mellitus serves as an example in our study, where we explore Swedish veterinarians' experiences of managing it in cats. Individual in-depth interviews were conducted with ten veterinarians, and the data were systematically analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. One overarching theme, the perceived prioritisation of the cat's wellbeing, was identified as central to how veterinarians approached the clinical situation. Three themes are addressed: the role of the owner in disease management, the negotiation between medical ideals and practical realities, and the perception of euthanasia as being in the best interest of the cat. Taken together, the three themes explore how veterinarians continually negotiate what it means to act responsibly within the constraints of real-life practice. This ongoing negotiation between ideals, pragmatism, and compassion underscores the ethical depth and emotional labour embedded in everyday veterinary work. The results contribute in-depth insights into how clinical reasoning and decision-making is shaped by both moral positions and pragmatic adaptations, and the importance of veterinary-owner communication in finding the optimal management plan in each individual case. Awareness of the challenges associated with diabetes care in cats may facilitate ethical reflexivity in veterinary practice, supporting decisions that impact both animal welfare and veterinarians' professional wellbeing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.