ArticlePLOS global public health2026
Exploring stakeholder perceptions of peer support initiatives in the management of diabetes in low- and middle-income countries: An online survey study.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Informal carers' perception on perspective taking when reporting as proxies about someone else's health.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Peer support is an effective strategy to promote self-management behaviors and improve well-being in those with cardiometabolic disease, including type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). There is limited knowledge about stakeholder perceptions regarding peer support programs in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The study assessed stakeholders' awareness and understanding of peer support initiatives for T2DM, and explored their perceived barriers and readiness for implementation. A cross-sectional, self-administered online survey with branching logic was distributed to stakeholders across macro- (health policy), meso (tertiary hospital), and micro (community) levels of LMIC healthcare systems from June 1 to December 15, 2023. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively; qualitative data underwent thematic content analysis. A total of 69 respondents from 25 LMICs participated in the survey. Due to branching logic and response attrition, 53 surveys (77%) had complete responses. Most respondents were medical doctors (n = 35, 50.7%) and a large proportion worked in tertiary hospitals (n = 27, 39.1%). Thirty-nine respondents (56.5%) were aware of peer support; among the 38 respondents with complete data, 29 (76%) reported active involvement in T2DM peer support initiatives. Of 15 responses to open-ended questionnaires regarding barriers to T2DM peer support, 9 (60%) cited concerns about limited resources and lack of funding. Local leadership (mean ± standard deviation: 3.4 ± 1.2), resource allocation (2.7 ± 1.4), and sustainability planning (2.7 ± 1.4) showed the highest perceived readiness on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree). Stakeholders in LMICs demonstrate awareness and active involvement in T2DM peer support programs. While limited resources and funding remain significant barriers, local leadership, resource allocation, and sustainability planning showed the highest perceived readiness, indicating promising foundations for implementation. Strengthening these areas through targeted support could facilitate the expansion and sustainability of peer support initiatives in resource-constrained settings.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.