Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41644315›Full record

ReviewZeitschrift fur medizinische Physik2026

Beyond CT: Attenuation correction for stand-alone brain PET.

Markus Jehl, Maria Jose Bonta, Ekaterina Mikhaylova, Max Ahnen, Simon R Cherry, Ilaria Sacco, Jannis Fischer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Markus JehlPositrigo AG, Switzerland. Electronic address: markus.jehl@positrigo.com.
Maria Jose BontaPositrigo AG, Switzerland.
Ekaterina MikhaylovaPositrigo AG, Switzerland.
Max AhnenPositrigo AG, Switzerland.
Simon R CherryDepartment of Radiology, University of California Davis Health, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Ilaria SaccoPositrigo AG, Switzerland.
Jannis FischerPositrigo AG, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate attenuation correction (AC) is essential for quantitative brain positron emission tomography (PET), but it presents a significant challenge for dedicated PET-only systems that lack anatomical information from computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging. This review provides a comprehensive overview of AC methods designed for stand-alone brain PET. We categorise and analyse existing approaches, including traditional segmentation-based techniques, atlas- and template-driven strategies, methods for simultaneous reconstruction of attenuation and activity, and modern data-driven deep learning techniques. We discuss the inherent trade-offs of each category: template-based methods are computationally efficient and robust for normal anatomy but may fail in atypical cases, while simultaneous reconstruction methods can be powerful but are often sensitive to noise and require time-of-flight information. Deep learning approaches have demonstrated the highest potential for generating patient-specific attenuation maps but are critically dependent on large, diverse training datasets and face challenges in generalisability. Finally, we survey the methods currently implemented in commercial brain-dedicated PET systems, revealing a gap between cutting-edge research and clinical practice, where simpler, more established techniques are still preferred. This review highlights the ongoing need for CT-less AC solutions that balance accuracy, robustness, and practical feasibility for clinical adoption.

Indexed as

BrainImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPositron-Emission TomographyTomography, X-Ray ComputedDeep LearningHumansAttenuation correctionDeep learningEmission-based methodsNeuroimagingPositron emission tomography (PET)Template registration

Identifiers

PMID41644315
PMCPMC13589434

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.