ArticleScientific reports2026
An in silico evaluation of signal and separability properties of k-edge materials in spectral CT.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Spectral CT can acquire signal at multiple x-ray energy levels. This enables material quantification by exploiting differences in x-ray attenuation across energy levels, particularly for k-edge materials. This simulation study quantified the signal and separability of current and potential clinical contrast agents across a range of materials and energies. A validated CT simulation platform was used to simulate a clinical photon-counting CT scanner with two energy thresholds. A cylindrical phantom containing common biological materials, clinical contrast agents, candidate contrast agents and nanoparticles, and investigational materials was imaged with varying upper energy thresholds (50–90 keV). At each energy level, images were assessed for noise, each material was assessed for contrast, and each material pair was evaluated for separability. Material contrasts reached peak value at the closest threshold higher than their respective k-edge. The energy threshold that produced the highest separability for each pair was characterized. Selection of energy threshold was dependent on the materials of interest. Threshold values at or just above a material’s k-edge maximized material signal while separability was maximized by the threshold that best separated k-edge signals.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.