ArticleScientific reports2026
A novel method of C-VBQ score and CT-HU as risk predictors for cage subsidence after short level ACDF.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We used a novel technique to measure subsidence after short-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with plate and screw fixation. And we aimed to evaluate cage subsidence by using cervical vertebral bone quality (C-VBQ) score and CT-HU. Quantitative assessment of vertebral bone quality was performed through two complementary methods: C-VBQ scoring and CT Hounsfield unit measurements, with their correlation established using Pearson’s analysis. The research methodology incorporated multiple statistical techniques, beginning with linear regression to examine demographic influences on C-VBQ values. For subsidence risk evaluation, all imaging datasets were rigorously compiled and subjected to multivariate regression analysis to identify significant contributing factors. The predictive validity of these factors was subsequently verified through ROC curve analysis, providing a robust assessment of their clinical utility. 112 patients who underwent short-level (≤ 2) ACDF were enrolled in this study, and 29 patients (25.89%) with cage subsidence were found. The subsidence group demonstrated significantly higher C-VBQ values (3.10 ± 0.22) compared to the non-subsidence cohort (2.70 ± 0.36, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified the C-VBQ score as the sole independent predictor of cage subsidence following ACDF, achieving an 83.9% predictive accuracy. CT-HU value exhibited a significant inverse relationship with C-VBQ scores (P < 0.001). Univariate regression analysis identified age as the only parameter significantly correlated with C-VBQ values (P < 0.001). The inverse relationship between C-VBQ and CT-HU suggests its validity as a bone quality measure. Importantly, C-VBQ proved clinically valuable for identifying subsidence risk in 1–2 level ACDF procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.